Age of Kings Heaven 139
Welcome
Downloads Home
Best Files
Review Guidelines
Main site
Forums
Code of Conduct
Search

Advanced Search
Single Player Scenarios
Home
New Releases
New Reviews
New Comments
Top-Rated

Submit File
Browse Categories
New Files
Recent Updates


The Partisans

Download File Post Review Post Comment
Author File Description
gaston
File Details
Version: The Conquerors
Style: Role Playing Strategy
Strictly speaking, this is not a "proper" AoK scenario. For one thing, it takes place in 1942, not in Middle Ages. I have
somehow grown tired of the endless Charlemagne, El Cid and Agincourt campaigns, not to mention the Riders of Rohan ones.
Don't get me wrong, they are OK, but let's try something else.

This little scenario is all about fighting: you have to think quick, stay alive and wisely fight your way through the enemy
lines.

You're surrounded and vastly outnumbered, you have no base, no castles and no walls, limited supplies, you fight to live,
otherwise starve or get killed. The only way is to use guerilla tactics, strike when and where not expected, regroup and
quickly withdraw, avoiding frontal fight and getting cornered.

Stay well. Have fun. And let me know of the bugs, if they occur.
AuthorComments & Reviews   ( All | Comments Only | Reviews Only )
rwilde
Rating
3.2
Breakdown
Playability2.0
Balance2.0
Creativity4.0
Map Design4.0
Story/Instructions4.0
Playability & Balance: 2

This is a scenario that I think I downloaded when it was new, or fairly new. It's one of those scenarios that try to represent WW2 using AoK units, and it does it pretty well.

You play as a group of Partisans fighting against the Germans and their allies in Yugoslavia during 1941. These units are janissaries, and they have increased HP and attack, such that they can take on a far superior enemy.

The enemy has bases around the map, the key one being well defended. You have a hospital to 'defend', although the hospital or villagers being killed does not result in loss, only a message about avenging them, so it is either a bug or shouldn't be stated as an objective.

The gameplay was unique, playing as a mass of super powered janissaries was a first, and I enjoyed it at first, but it became quite repetitive. There were interesting objectives in the level, and elements like food supply which meant you had to kill and keep on killing.

The idea of the level is a 'hit and run' and 'create ambushes/diversions' theme, but that's not really how I played it. Splitting my force never seemed like a good idea, and the idea of tactically playing hit and run seemed contradictory to the ideas of fast kills and a time limit.

One of the main objectives was to kill the Nazi commander, who had an 'instant kill' attack, and very high HP - he was also surrounded by a squad of attack dogs, which were also an important part of the enemy makeup.

I found the units stat changes (prominent in both your and enemy units) quite balanced and well thought out. One thing that annoyed me though is that on losing (and starting the scenario, I think) you see the short Microsoft cinematic - this was irritating and seemed irrelevant.

The unit that really ruined the gameplay for me was the siege onager ('artillery'). Janissaries simply aren't meant to take on these beasts, and even on standard the masses of them that kept on killing me were a nuisance, and took the fun and the balance out of the level. I think few of them, perhaps with a higher attack and lower HP would be okay.

In the end after several hours of playing this level I gave up. I tried it on moderate initially, then standard (which I thought would be easier). I'm an experienced player and I usually find levels too easy on moderate. If playing on standard any level should be pretty easy, this one was still very challenging.

Perhaps if I used better tactics I could win, but I just wasn't enjoying the level enough to keep trying, and the onagers and time limit made the frustration too much. It seems as if the author has made the level hard to beat on standard himself - if he made it hard on hard it would be better balanced.

Creativity: 4

The gameplay was very unique. This was the first time I got to play as powered up janissaries and I got intimately acquainted with the subtleties of the unit - the splash damage they seemed to do to surrounding units was amplified by their attack such that one volley on a unit could take down 4 or 5. The subject was one uncommon for AoK but tackled well given the difficulty. I think it was bad for the gameplay and story to some extent, but for creativity the WW2 setting was a bonus. The scenario was in Yugoslavia and not something mainstream like D-Day. The map had some interesting eye candies, while there were many creative objectives (e.g. killing all towers to stop units spawning), systems (collecting food for kills and some other things) and there was also the timing factor which is seldom seen - you only have about 30 minutes until German reinforcements arrive and overwhelm you.

Map Design: 4

The map is large and designed in a realistic way, with a lot of terrain brush, but also some subtle eye candies, one which I thought quite classy, a shallows/snow grass river flowing down a hill. The bases were designed to make for strategic attacks, and the WW2 feel was there, without use of sounds or a mod pack.

Story/Instructions: 4

This area was handled well with a nice bitmap, thorough history, instructions and hints. On the brief occasions I did get to the final defend part I wasn't sure what I had to do to win though. I couldn't really feel immersed in the scenario as I just don't find AoK convincing for WW2 scenarios. Perhaps with some sound effects it would take me closer, but still I don't find it quite believable.

Overall: 3.2

This scenario would have done a lot better if it wasn’t for the balance. I went from enjoying the scenario to detesting the small things that I found frustrating, and I felt let down that I couldn’t beat it. Not recommended for download.
gaston
File Author
I'd like to thank rwilde for the review of my scenario - although it took me some time to see it. Not that I'm much satisfied with the rating, but hey - you don't argue with the referee, do you?

There are also a few things to point out.

In the scenario you command a partisan detachment with a task to protect the refugees hiding in the hospital. The hospital (building) itself is of no importance, it is the refugees you should try to protect. Anyway, if they are killed, the main objective changes: you are to stay alive and to break through the enemy lines (i.e. kill the Nazi commander, destroy the enemy HQ, bring all the survivors there and prevent the enemies from following you by keeping them on a distance). Rwilde mentions the right strategy of winning - splitting forces and creating diversions all over the map, ambushing while retreating, etc.

Also, rwilde is right: I did make the scenario quite hard to win on purpose - in reality, winning in such circumstances would be even harder if not impossible. But it can be done - here is an example of the winning strategy (played on Hardest, and saving the refugees, it takes about 20 minutes to win).

http://aok.heavengames.com/blacksmith/showfile.php?fileid=7321

Of course, there are other strategies.

For example, if your refugees get killed, your combat units gain extra "anger" points that make them stronger.

You could also try to sneak up the beastly Onagers from behind (a few at a time, using 5-6 combat units), especially on the levels below Hard.

On rare occasions you could manoeuvre your units into defeating/obliterating all enemy units, but that takes skill and patience. You couldn't expect Yugoslav partisans to do it, not in 1942.

Also, sometimes the Chetniks and the Ustashas will start a quarrel among themselves and forget about you - use it well - it won't last long.

Sometimes your detachment will be crushed - only a few survivors remaining, hiding and facing starvation. That is another realistic situation in which you could try to avoid the enemy and sneak to the flagged area of the base (provided the Nazi leader and the HQ are eliminated).

Rwilde, you've done a good job. Thanks. I could agree with you on almost everything except the final line of the review. I think the scenario is worth a try.

[Edited on 11/27/05 @ 11:59 AM]

rwilde Just noticed the new recorded game file there. I'll make a note to come back to this and try again.
ByZaN SHould of made the Cetnik Serbs, my Grandads (and part of my mums) side of the family were Cetniks. They were Royalists, who fought for the king and Serbia.
gaston
File Author
It's hard for me to understand what you mean, ByZaN, but I'll try to answer you anyway. The scenario wasn't meant either to conway or propagate any political statement, for the history has spoken its word on all the parties involved. Just... I sincerely hope you're not too proud of your Chetnik ancestry. The Chetniks did fight for the King and for Serbia, but in doing so they collaborated with the Nazis and the Fascists, and they comitted atrocities against civilians - even the Serbs. Stay well and look ahead.
laz123 Where's the hospital?

[Edited on 10/03/08 @ 04:48 PM]

Rebel Troop maybe it would be a good idea to download the rennassiance and use catapults instead of magonels

Post Review Post Comment

HGDL v0.7.1

Login
Forum Username:


Password:




Create a new account
Forgot password?
Rating
3.2
Breakdown
Playability2.0
Balance2.0
Creativity4.0
Map Design4.0
Story/Instructions4.0
Statistics
Downloads:513
Favorites: [Who?]0
Size:84.55 KB
Added:05/10/05