The Iraqi people who support the war and you see on TV are taped by an American Solder with camera in one hand and a gun in the other. I think that helps gain "support" when they are interviewed. I think that the war on Iraq has caused problems, but the main reason I do not support is not moral (but I am moraly agasint it). It will cause HUGE problems ten years from now. America will have to fight North Korea, then why not go after some South American country for fun? Then a few warring Aferican countries, always "for there own good". Not only that but like Afganistan the America helped when they fought Russia Iraq will enevtualy be ruled by fanatic crazy goups (Kurdish rebels, or any one who might help America in the short run like the "Nothren Alliance" in Afganistan who are no longer Allies and are fighting eachother). When I say crazies I am not taking about Muslims. Al Qadi are crimanls. They are not ture Muslims like Bush is not a ture Christain. A good Christian would not kill thousands so he could make a few dollars and get reveange. This will cause LOTS of econimical, mitary, social, ect. problems in the future.
I do believe that Saddam is evil. I am not Anti-American. I think that the the way Bush is handling America is stupid. If he was a skilled statsman or smart he could have had support and everyone would have went with him. He could have attacked Iraq with specail forces blaiming it in the Kurds. Then Blown up one of his own ships and blaimed it on Saddam. Yes this is sick and mean and would have caused a war, but not as many after afects would have been their. He should have been DEFENDING not ATTACKING. I don't think Bush realises what is happening and Dick Shanny (sp?) is using him like a cheep wh... The world let America bomb the hell out of Afganistan because their was something concreat. People need to see a reason. I hope he is at least smart enough to plant weapons of mass-destruction. This will gain him some support, as long as he plays it right and doesn't get carried away. In Canada this whould case more resentment to our leading party for being "wrong". A more pro-American stance would be taken. This is reality and it sucks.
Iraq does have wapons, the ones we sold them (Dick's compine suplied them with LOTS of equipment). But we are not in harm's way. Their is no way that it can reach us. Isreal is the only nation that should be afraid. We should not be afraid of bombs, or diseas, or flying. The people who will attack the West (with good cause mind you) have a weapon more feasom and scarry then any nuke, they are willing to die. Deep down we want our solders to come home and so do they. The "Terrorist" (as the worlds largest terrorest, Bush, calles them) don't inteand to live. The reson the goverment does not like to talk about this is because it is hard to fight. Bombs can be found and eliminated, vaciens bought fot ills. But a person who is willing to die cannot be stoped. That is why Irland, Isral, many African countires, Balkine nations, Chehnia, ect. are in trouble. How do you stop that?
Origanly I was just going to say I am against the war but I ended up typing a criptic end-of-the-world senerio. I don't feel like deleting it all so here is is read it and ignore 99% of it, (especaily the whole thing about blowing up boats).
"For you were brought into this world with nothing and you shall take nothing out." 1 Tim. 6:7